[quote=“Steve Ferrario” post=79086]
Now I may fall in the minority on this one, but has anyone considered that there was a hidden agenda all along? Hmmm, lets see why & how these Norcal engines are so strong. Lets get a first hand look & shorten the 6-8 year learning curve it took Norcal builders to develop in 1 afternoon of tearing down the front runners motors.
If one of the cars that dyno’d was in question for heat soaking motor then as a result the powers at be decide to completely tear down the top 3,4,or even 5 finishers. What about the motors that inherited 3rd & 4th by default of the DQ, DQ & DQ? Reminds me of pro cycling…Lance Armstrong stripped of all TDF victories, some of those next in line were also on the juice, so somewhere down the line in some of those years 4-8th actually could be the winner but they were not tested…I mean torn down.[/quote]
Reminds you of pro cycling…really? In that case, didn’t everyone know the front runner was cheating but had been denying it for years? And didn’t that same front runner (Armstrong) first deny the claims, then go on National TV and admit that he lied to everyone for years?
For that matter, if the engines were all perfectly legal and within all the rules, what would be learned from opening them up? If all the parts were within factory spec, what knowledge would be gained?
Unless I am mistaken, the top 5 cars are always impounded and inspected at National events. I don’t know why anyone would think this event would be any different? Where is the hidden agenda? Was there a plan to impound the top cars discussed/submitted before the event or race?