Summit Point next month


#21

[quote]
I don’t think anyone is corrupt either, but I do believe (and have pointed out) if anyone thinks a NASA officials car is going to be targeted for tech inspection and / or that inspection would be done with the fullest due diligence they’re nuts.[/quote]
FYI when we have some kind of random tech for diff. strength, camber setting, etc. carter almost always volunteers his own car to be tested with the others. Cobetto’s car has also been tested several times on the dyno, for alignment, etc.

My point about corruption is that if you are saying someone is making a rules change to benefit themselves or their friends, this is what you are accusing them of. I am not happy with the rule changes. My spec exhaust just broke for the third time, and until last week I still had two prime sets of RA1s in my garage. I definately would have been able to do some more events this year if we hadn’t made these changes, but I dont think carter or anyone else had selfish intentions when they made these rules.
Besides, it still beats the candy out of spec miata :slight_smile:


#22

Sasha said “Racing at this level should be fun, and for me fun doesn’t include banging around.”

I’d say the JP Memorial No Arms race was both fun and included some banging around… even it most of the banging was your head and the hardened earth around Road Atlanta :pinch:

Other than that… I’m sure either things will either get fixed or fix themselves. That’s the way the world works.


#23

First of all, it’s disappointing that a thread designed to improve a race weekend turned into an “us vs. them” argument, and yet another “venting” from a bitter racer.

However, I must respond to a few items. I will try to keep it as brief as possible.

I’m sure the driving/racing talent level in the SE has gotten much better. At the last Summit weekend, I spoke with Mike Skeen and he told me that several racers have made big improvements in their racing. Good for them! And I hope to get an opportunity to race with them again.

I do like the fact that they have so many tracks available to their region, and I wish we had the same in the Mid Atlantic. For sure, some of the racing formats in the Southeast are interesting and I brought this up at the last Mid Atlantic race weekend. Interestingly, the racers did not respond favorably…but it was their call.

I also agree that racing at Summit Point three times in a row gets a little bland. In the future, the Mid Atlantic Region might be able to add a few tracks which will certainly help increase interest and improve the numbers for Spec E30 and all other classes.

Regarding Vic’s comments which he calls “facts”; he has absolutely no idea what it is like to manage the rules in this series. I am pulled in every direction possible by different drivers and their opinions, from all over the United States, who have an opinion, yet Vic only sees his own viewpoint and that of his small group of pals who own blue and white cars and who seem to fall in-line with everything Vic says and does.

And while I won’t address every Vic point here, I will address a few. And I will do it as a mature adult.

-When Vic late-braked turn one at VIR, went-off out of control, came back on half-in-control, and drove into the left rear of my car, the collision pushed the fender lip into the left rear tire shoulder, that rubbed a large trough in the tire. I saw the constant tire smoke in the rearview mirror and not wanting a blowout in the race, I went to the pits. Vic writes “that most other racers would have keep driving away on.” but I don’t think that would have been the smart thing to do. Vic’s driving ruined my race, he gained a position because of the contact (this is what got him DQ’d, per the NASA contact rules), and he ruined one of my brand new tires. I then went through the NASA contact rules, by the book, and Vic was DQ’d (and after NASA reviewed a video). And Vic still maintains to this day that someone was out to get him.

At Summit this year, I late braked a turn, made contact with another driver, I gained a position, and I chose to go to the pits well before the end of the race, even though my car was fine. Vic and I basically did the same thing yet he complains about being DQ’d, and I voluntarily stopped racing because of my mistake. And during the post race discussion, I was officially DQ’d by the region “that loves Carter.”

-Vic proposes some interesting ideas…that will cost a lot of money to implement. Yet he complains about a few Rules changes that did cost some money.

-Vic came to a region that is serious about racing, is DQ’d by the NASA officials for having the wrong tires on the car, and throws a big fit. I will never, ever, ever complain about being DQ’d by anyone for having the wrong tires on my car, a clear and established rule. I’m assuming this was Vic’s little “protest” about the tire rule and it didn’t go his way. So he stormed off in a huff. Whether Vic likes it or not, and regardless of his opinions, NASA really wanted us to go to the R888 tire. And our race weekends are NASA weekends. Plus, Toyo assured NASA and me that the R888 would perform exactly like the RA-1. Should I have disregarded their assurance? Should Vic be angry with Toyo? Should Spec E30 have gone back to the RA-1, or allowed both tires, or gone to a different tire brand? Clearly, Toyo put NASA and Spec E30 in a difficult position.

-Skip Bennett was not DQ’d at Summit this year, because he did not blatantly break a clear and established rule. The HP/TQ rule will be posted after I present my proposal to the Spec E30 Regional Series Directors and to NASA, and it is discussed by us, and presented to the Spec E30 racers. This will be done by this weekend. And if a car breaks that clear and established rule, that car and the driver’s finishing position will be DQ’d by NASA officials, because NASA enforces the Rules that they approve. And while it is definitely against NASA National’s wishes (we had this discussion too), some Regions enforce rules as they choose. I think this is a mistake, but that’s between NASA and their Regions.

-Vic dismisses the oil pan cover allowance…because he doesn’t race at Road Atlanta. I received several legitimate requests for this from Southeast racers who emailed photos to me of broken oil pans. Again, Vic only sees his own viewpoint and any other is meaningless. I’ll bet the Southeast guys really like this rule.

-Vic wants a “committee” to decide how the rules are managed. Just yesterday, I received a well thought-out proposal from a racer, and it is being reviewed for my proposal to the Regional Series Directors and to NASA. And so everyone knows, the Spec E30 Regional Series Directors review every rule change proposal from me, and from racers who want to constructively voice their opinions, and NASA has to approve any changes. Hardly a dictatorship.

I can go on and on about several other “facts” from Vic but I won’t bother the group. But I will say one last thing about this. Vic, and this is directly to you Vic. Several racers in the Mid Atlantic have mentioned to me, and without any prodding from me, that they do not miss you at all. Several are glad that you have chosen to race elsewhere. And if you are happier racing with a different region and/or a different class, good for you. And I don’t say that sarcastically. I truly want you to be happy racing where you choose.

With that said, I want all Spec E30 racers to enjoy racing in Spec E30 and if anyone has any suggestions or ideas, send them to me or to your local Spec E30 Regional Series Director. The Regional Series Directors and I will then discuss any idea, as a group, and if we all think it’s a good idea, we will propose it to NASA.

I will also openly report our discussions (prior to any rule change) to the Spec E30 racers, so everyone can clearly see exactly where Spec E30 is heading.

Carter Hunt
Spec E30 National Series Director


#24

allenr wrote:

So the guys that would know what they’re checking for, and when a dyno would show up are legal when that stuff is checked?

Shocking!

And the secret committee that meets in an undisclosed place at undetermined times is rules clarity too. I’m done ranting on this. I honestly don’t really care, the SE has managed to insulate themselves pretty well from this. As long as that continues I’m fine and if it doesn’t I’ll go race somwhere / something else. Since they moved Nationals to Miller I have at least another 2 years before I’d have to worry about it.

Didn’t mean to thread hi-jack I think this turned into a “reasons people don’t want to race in MA” vs “reasons people don’t want to race at SP in the MA”

We had a lot of CMP this year so I’m sure the low attendance is due mostly to seeing the same track again and again. Or other stuff…


#25

Carter wrote:

I would be glad to relieve of your duty and find out first hand.

That would be the entire field at Summit - what was it again? Seven total racers? Eight maybe? And how many of them are brand new? Your turnover rate is astounding. I’ll go out on a limb and say that the army of racers that have called and e-mailed their support would be found more frequently on the podium, even if the racing was mediocre.


#26

Carter wrote:

Oh yeah, the Salazar boys and girls are gonna love this quote. This will be fodder for the X-mas party.

Is the SE not serious about racing? If not, did you race with them at all this year to find out?

Is his car legal? (a question I don’t pretend to have an answer to) Is a 20HP advantage more acceptable than old tires?


#27

Vic, I don’t know you, have never met you but you sure seem to think that Carter is out to get you somehow. Maybe he is, how would I know? but from the cheap seats it doesn’t seem like it and you come off as a whiner.

You have a lot of conflicting information in your post, you complain about the spec exhaust and having to change your exhaust 3 times. Obviously that is not ideal for the budget conscious racer. I still think the spec exhaust is amazingly cheap and I only spent $300 on both my systems, the first one and the current spec one. That is equivalent to about 2 tires, or a set of brake pads. But you do admit that it makes a difference because you agree that you were down on power at VIR. Boy you really seem to take this seriously for someone that just wants to have fun. What happened to the guy that said the exhaust doesn’t make a difference it is just costing us money. But then you go on about the loopholes in the rules, to which I agree with your ideas. Wasn’t the spec exhaust a loop hole? So since you would like to sit in Carter’s seat for a while, what do you propose to do about say a spec sway bar? So we spec the bar, everybody has to run ST bars now. Half the guys racing now have to change bars, who do you think is going to be pissed off? Guys like you are going to be pissed. There will be a 10 page thread on sway bars, you will come on here and make a post about how much its costing you. And of course it’s a conspiracy that ST bars were chosen because they were already on Carter’s car and etc etc you get the point. So because of the way you guys reacted to the exhaust I just don’t see them getting implemented just yet, that’s just my gut feeling but I know if I was in Carter’s shoes I would be hesitant to implement something like this. Should this stuff have been spec’d from the start, ultimately yes but it wasn’t so you tell me what you would do if you were in Carter’s shoes? I’m curious. The rules are pretty good, not perfect but show me a race series that has perfect rules? I think Carter has done an admiral job from where I’m sitting, and I think I speak for the majority of racers in this regard. You have no idea how difficult it is to manage rules like this.

Regarding the RA1 issues. Do you agree that you were illegal that race? If so what is your argument? And then you don’t race the next day like some sort of spoilt child. Put yourself in the other racers shoes. Lets say you finished 2nd to racer x. You are legal, you spent money on new R888’s. Racer X is on old potentially faster RA1’s, you think this is bullshit because you followed the rules, spent money on tires and get beat by a guy on illegal tires. Now I don’t think there is anything wrong with running the old RA1’s. If it was me and I could not afford to run the new R888’s I would have approached Carter and the other races and said, look I know I’m on illegal tires does anyone have a problem with that? Assuming they did, I would just say that’s fine, I’m going to race on them anyway knowing I will be DQ’d I just want to have some fun racing with everybody. Or quoting you “I just want to go racing and not have to worry about the BS that has plagued this season in the MA”. Maybe you should follow what you preach because it doesn’t sound like you just want to go racing. I certainly wouldn’t leave the next day, I’d race anyway knowing I would start from the back and get Dq’d at the end. It would still be fun trying to work through the pack. Isn’t that what Amateur racing is about having fun? Then you imply that Carter should have DQ’d Skip at Summit. I wasn’t there but it was pretty apparent that Skip had more power. So again lets put you in Carter’s shoes since you seem to have a handle on this. What are you going to do? His car looks legal, there is nothing in the rules that says he can’t have whatever hp and tq he wants. Are you going to DQ him because you think he is illegal on no real evidence. Again what would you have done? You also “cringe every time I hear about a statistician looking at HP Numbers” but yet that program might have DQ’d Skip? Would it not?

You said you were going to quit racing Spec E30, but I still see you racing and on this board. Now you are going to run GTS or PTE for fun? Seriously if you think that is more fun than running with the Mid Atlantic boys in a pack of E30s going around VIR then more power to you. Vic, I’m sure you are a great guy, I’d like to actually race with you once if you would just visit Mid Ohio like you said you would, you are obviously fast in a race car and a guy that likes to have fun at the track. I just hope you can get this chip off your shoulder and get back to what Spec E30 is all about which is great on track and off track fun at a cheap price. Carter is not making rule decisions in a vacuum, the regional directors also help to discuss rule changes with him. You obviously have some good ideas about the rules which I think can certainly spark some good discussion.

Respectfully


#28

Everyone in this thread needs to be at vir in february to settle this on the track :evil:


#29

Carter wrote:

After giving this more thought, I think the tent and banner are pretty good ideas. In the Southeast… we’ve found live chickens are a big hit as well. Don’t waste any time with dead possums. They’re fun for a while but once they start to thaw, they tend to run more people off they they attract.

:dry:
:S


#30

Carter wrote:

You asked for it… Rent Al Taylor for the weekend:

[size=2]Image Credit: Brendan Digel[/size]


#31

Vic –

We haven’t met yet, but I look forward to it. You are clearly a talented driver and a passionate advocate for what you believe. But it strikes me that you may be off base on your attacks.

Philosophy
Spec E30 is run by Carter. Call it a benevolent dictatorship, a malevolent dictatorship, a fiefdom or whatever. It doesn’t matter. Like it (him?) or not, he was a founder of the class and has earned his position.

If you were at the very first race and have been active ever since, but still can’t get Carter’s ear on rules, maybe it is your approach? I am sure you are simply a guy who is passionate about our sport. We need that level of dedication.

There is a humorous parallel with Spec Miata. There is an engineer from Ohio who is fast. Wins races and stuff. Challenged for the win at nationals the last 2 years.

Last year he was absolutely merciless in his attacks on the rules. Pointing out loopholes, suggesting new rules to ‘help’ the class. But his favorite target was the '99 and newer Miatas. To him, they never should have been allowed in the class because they were too different to achieve parity with the older cars (which he drove). The '99s were ruining the class. '99 drivers were basically trying to buy themselves a win. That kind of thing.

He never tried honey. Always vinegar. What car did he show up in at this year’s nationals? A '99. Some people just like to argue their own position for the fun of it. If you don’t agree with them, then you are somehow mentally deficient or evil.

That being said, I don’t think I will change your mind, Vic. But for the benefit of new guys reading this, I’d like to offer my perspective.

SE30 works. Cheap donors. Enough stuff to play with to keep tinkerers happy. Good field sizes. Close racing. Is SE30 perfect? Heck no. Is it a good place to learn racecraft in relatively cheap, pretty darn well matched cars (regardless of cost)? Hell yes.

Unless you are selling turnkey racecars with sealed everything, there will be variation in prep level.

Rules
For the long term health of the class and its drivers, I think that the overarching goal of the rules should be (in order of importance):

  • maximize safety
  • remedy common failure parts that impact reliability
  • minimize performance differences between cars
  • minimize costs related to non-wear items
  • minimize costs related to wear items

If cost is at the top of your list, maybe racing a Civic in ITB or PT should be your goal.

I don’t think ‘dirt cheap racing’ and BMW will ever go together. The replacement parts are costly and the cars are 20 years old.

Exhaust/Horsepower
I’m confused about your argument about the spec exhaust. You don’t seem to be advocating a lot of testing prior to specifying sway bars or bushings or spacer choices. But for spec exhaust you say it harmed you because you didn’t get the horsepower gain everyone else did. I’ve heard the system actually took torque away.

The most troubling thing I see about the upcoming Max HP/TQ rule is that peak numbers aren’t the whole story. If we spec a max, I will spend some money trying to maximize the area under the curves. Does that make me a bad guy?

That is why I think we can take a page from the spec miata book and really clamp down on what can and can’t be done to engine internals. Unfortunately, the largely unavailable full E30 workshop manual does not have the specificity that the Mazda manual has regarding measurements and allowed rebuilding processes.

If anyone thinks that a Max HP/TQ rule will equalize the cars, you’re kidding yourself. Without an effective means to do at-track detuning (restrictor plate?), you run the risk of people showing up not knowing if their car will be determined to be illegal. The variation in dyno readings (dyno to dyno) makes this rule fraught with trouble, IMHO.

But it is better than nothing (maybe).

- Spec a camber plate instead of setting a max camber – otherwise you leave ride height open. You’re just begging for someone to come up with a custom high dollar plate.

Like sway bars, spec a mass-produced camber plate.

- Disallow adjustable fuel pressure regulators. Why where these allowed in the first place?! There are gains to be had in messing with Fuel and timing.

With the stock airbox and stock injectors, does additional fuel pressure really help?

- Limit wheel and spacer choices. Right now, I can run a 15mm spacer with my Koseis. Really should just be bottlecaps or basketweaves all around.

With a maximum track rule, you effectively limit spacers. I’d prefer not to run on wheels that have been corroding and hitting curbs for 20 years. For a few hundred bucks a set more than bottlecaps, I’m picking new wheels every time. Cheap insurance.

- Gas-tank size for endures. Carter and Carlton benefited tremendously by having the only legal “big” tank at last year’s VIR enduro. We screamed about it as a community yet nothing was done.

It would be cheaper for everyone to put a minimum number of pit stops in the supps that corresponds to the smallest stock tank. Of course that only solves the in-class parity and takes away a necessary advantage for an SE30 to compete with SM in E2 enduro classing.

Oil pan cover? One of only 2 DNFs I have ever had was a cracked pan on the exit curbing of Turn 7 at Road Atlanta. If you don’t think it is necessary, don’t put one on your car.

Vic - You stated that you were penalized for erratic driving. Caused by you because you had to drive the wheels off because you were down on power. Guess what? There were no rules on the book that said ‘you can bump if that’s what it takes to be competitive because you brought a lesser car to the race.’

I think it is offensive to the NASA officials to accuse them of being cozy with Carter. Hell I don’t know. They may be. Or they may favor the more reasoned party. If you argue your case to the officials the way you argue your case to Carter over rules, it’s no wonder their findings don’t favor you.

Nobody’s getting rich on this stuff. Everyone involved does it primarily for the love of the sport. Your kvetching lessens that satisfaction for everyone. If racers vote with their feet and leave the class, then change might occur.

If you do your own work, you can probably sell your car to a newbie and build a Spec3 for not much more. Go where you can be happy. Life’s too short to make yourself miserable.

Steve D.


#32

Steve, Simon,
Thanks for the posts - very objective and constructive, and I hope to tangle on track with you guys some day.

Dunno what I’m gonna do next year - it’ll depend on what the boys in white and blue wanna do.

-Vic


#33

victorhall wrote:

[quote]
Dunno what I’m gonna do next year - it’ll depend on what the boys in white and blue wanna do.

-Vic[/quote]

Well I hope you consider Spec E30 still because it really is a great series if you step back and look at it. I race in this series for many of the reasons you race here and I think you will be disapointed if you try something else. Its not perfect but the main reasons I race spec E30 are

  1. Competition
    Spec E30 has some of the best drivers I’ve seen in one class. I think this is probably true of most spec classes. The cars are also very close and they race well. There is a reason that a lot of spectactors like watching us race.

  2. Cost
    Its cheap, even if you change exhausts 3 times :laugh:, its still cheap

  3. NASA
    I like racing with NASA I now have plenty of events close to me. I also like having one big championship event (whether I can go or not)

  4. BMW - I’ve always raced BMW’s and its not a Miata which is basically a chicks car, sorry Steve :wink:


#34

Elephant4 wrote:

Agreed. Sorry Steve.


#35

Ohhhhh. Like YOU’VE never worn women’s underwear…
:stuck_out_tongue:

It takes a real man to race a secretary’s car.

Steve D.

PS - Once you get past the embarassment, the racing kicks a$$. And less metal-to-metal than a MidAtlantic E30 race. :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue: :stuck_out_tongue:


#36

Back on topic-
FYI for those who are racing summit next weekend, the 4 hr enduro on sunday has been replaced by a 1 hr. sprint race for all race groups

http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=24535

Although I’m probably just talking to myself since there appear to be only 5 of us going… only two of which read the forums… one of which new of the decision before it was announced… and the other one being me :S


#37

I haven’t registered yet, but will probably be racing Saturday.

I’m undecided for the Sunday sprint.


#38

allenr wrote:

[quote]Back on topic-
FYI for those who are racing summit next weekend, the 4 hr enduro on sunday has been replaced by a 1 hr. sprint race for all race groups

http://www.nasaforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=24535

Although I’m probably just talking to myself since there appear to be only 5 of us going… only two of which read the forums… one of which new of the decision before it was announced… and the other one being me :S[/quote]

I signed up for the enduro only to have it cancelled. :frowning:

So, how many people are going since we do not have any updates on the NASA Mid-Atlantic site?

-Steve


#39

I will be there and so will my Jameson!


#40

Great. I assumed that we would have similar turnout to last month.

Steve- Is your car good to go? I assume you signed up for sprints too.

Joe- I thought your crew was going to njmp. Glad to see you will be there. BTW is johnny coming to this one? He’d better come unless he wants me to pass him for 4th in the points :stuck_out_tongue: :evil: ;).

ps- I saw somewhere that phils tire will be at njmp instead of summit…