I think Steve D. in CA runs non-adjustable ones.
I say run them….I got AKGs “adjustable� but had to return them because they didn’t fit properly. To AKGs credit they sent me new ones and an “extra� part as gift to make up for the mistake. This set-back my built time table a bit, but hopefully I’ll have time to install them in the next few days – and I pray that they fir properly. At this point I wish I just ordered non-adjustable RTABs and be done with this part of the build.
Adjustable’s have obvious advantage but I am not sure what the associated cost over time it will be. Due to the setups that we are allowed to run, camber and toe can not be adjusted separately, so to do it properly there will (potentially) a long time spent on the alignment rack, which translates to a lot of $$$.
This article describes what I mean by "camber and toe can not be adjusted separately":
http://e30m3performance.com/tech_articles/susp-tech/ecc_bush/ecc_bush.htm
If we are able to run something like this
http://e30m3performance.com/installs/installs-3/jl_sub/index.htm
I think it would be actually cheaper
because “centered bushings� are cheaper, it’s much quicker (and hence cheaper) to adjust camber and toe settings, and couple of brackets and 4 bolts have only negligible price (have it professionally welded shouldn’t be that expensive either), and there is no performance difference, that I can see, between two setups.
(And no I am not trying to argue rules, I had enough of that for one month… )
Igor