leggwork wrote:
[quote]no, the way that sentence is (badly) structured, everything “may be removed” except for the parenthetical note about the 3rd brake light remaining in place. The only real reason for replacement panels in the front is to protect the driver/passenger from shattering glass.
bruce
motormuncher wrote:
[quote]leggwork wrote:
[quote]your number 1 is correct, with a stock 3rd brake light remaining.
bruce[/quote]
Bruce.
(side panels and package shelf (third brake light shall remain in place)), It was my understanding that the rear panels were to be left in place on the two door models. In the four door models the rear panels are considered DOOR panels and by the rules are required to remain unless replaced by .06 al.
I thought we had covered this before the nationals last year. I know that Valley Motorwerks went to great lengths to ensure the legality of the cars (including mine) that were presented at Mid-Ohio.[/quote][/quote]
I have to agree with Bruce. I remember this debate coming up a while back (and it was because folks were reading just part of the paragraph, not the entire thing). So here’s the complete rule:
9.3.13.22. The interior, including carpeting, seats, headliner (to include the leading plastic
panel), console, radio/cd/cassette/navigation systems, OEM seat belts, speakers, glove
box door, panels under the dash, grab handles, driver and passenger door (front and
rear) window glass and mechanisms, heating and cooling system interior ducts, rear
passenger compartment trim panels (side panels and package shelf (third brake light
shall remain in place)), and sun visors, may be removed.
I would interpret that to be any trim panel in the rear that isn’t on the door.
I agree with you that any door panel has to remain intact unless it is replaced with the .060 aluminum panels (as covered in the next rule). Per the regulations “…“may” is permissive.”
9.3.13.23. Door panels may be replaced with 0.060-inch aluminum or comparable material,
securely attached to the door.
Just my 2 cents…