As many of you may already know, there are many environmental and situational factors which play a role in dyno results. Therefore, I believe it is even more important for everyone to take the opportunity to dyno at the track with others. I was not in the top four, so I had to pay $85 to get my results at Summit but I believe it was a good choice due to the fact that I could compare against others within the same general factors (i.e. same dyno, same environmental factors).
I had just finished a head job and was hoping for good numbers but my horse power & torque was down from the competitive cars. I also learned that the car was running very rich (as low as 12.4 air to fuel ratio) so that may be a culprit. My max HP was 149.1 and max torque was 141.2. The car doesn’t skip a beat and runs smooth so I’m hoping the tuning advice I received from people like Mike Skeen, Paul Poore and Ziggy will help the numbers (at least with the torque).
As competitive as a person that I am with almost everything I do, I still cannot say I’m upset with the dyno numbers. I agree with Robert Allen’s comments. For me, being out in the paddock with my fellow racers, prepping the car and working on my driving skills it what does it for me. HOWEVER, I do believe it’s important that a maximum allowable HP and torque are determined for the series. That’s the point of a spec class right? Nobody fancy’s being the one to protest that someone has done illegal work to their engine or drive train but its got to be managed some how. I don’t know what the numbers will be but it’s also important that a lot of thought goes into the limit so it doesn’t limit those that are staying within the spec but spending more time tuning. Maybe an average is taken then there’s a cushion of 3-5HP & torque just to play it safe for those that are in fact staying within the rules. Let the rest play out with the racing skills. A 10-12HP & torque difference from the top runners is a concern though.
Also, I’ve attached my dyno results for everyone to see.